Co-authors:
Satori Garrison and Matthew Garrison
February 5th 2025
The AI Arms Race and the Rise of DeepSeek vs OpenAI
The world of artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, with groundbreaking advancements emerging at a breakneck pace. In this dynamic landscape, two major players have taken center stage: DeepSeek, a rising force from China, and OpenAI, an American-based powerhouse.
These two companies are locked in a fierce battle for AI supremacy, a technological arms race that has far-reaching implications for the future of our world. Their competition is not just about algorithms and data; it’s about hardware, infrastructure, and the very foundation upon which AI is built.
Nvidia, the dominant provider of graphics processing units (GPUs) that have become the workhorse of AI computing, has seen its stock prices soar in recent years, fueled by the insatiable demand for its powerful chips. But the emergence of DeepSeek and OpenAI, with their innovative approaches to AI hardware, could disrupt Nvidia’s reign and reshape the entire AI landscape.
In this article, we’ll delve into the battle between DeepSeek and OpenAI, analyzing their shared technologies, their diverging paths, and the potential impact on Nvidia’s market dominance. We’ll explore the cost-effectiveness of their hardware choices, the intricacies of GPU technology, and the limitations of the current AI hardware paradigm.
Finally, we’ll unveil a bold vision for the future of AI hardware, a paradigm shift that could redefine the technological landscape and position America as the undisputed leader in the AI revolution.
DeepSeek and OpenAI, despite their fierce rivalry, share a common foundation in several core AI technologies. Both companies leverage the power of deep learning algorithms, which enable their models to learn from vast amounts of data and perform complex tasks, such as natural language processing and computer vision.
Shared Technologies and Diverging Paths
Deep learning, a subset of machine learning, involves training artificial neural networks on massive datasets to recognize patterns, make predictions, and generate human-like text or images. Both DeepSeek and OpenAI utilize deep learning algorithms to power their respective language models, enabling them to engage in conversations, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer questions in an informative way.
Natural language processing (NLP) focuses on enabling computers to understand, interpret, and generate human language. Both companies have made significant strides in NLP, allowing their AI models to engage in increasingly nuanced and sophisticated conversations, translate languages with impressive accuracy, and even generate creative text formats, such as poems, code, scripts, musical pieces, and articles.
Computer vision, another shared domain, involves enabling computers to “see” and interpret images and videos. DeepSeek and OpenAI utilize computer vision to analyze images, identify objects and faces, and even generate realistic images or videos based on text prompts.
However, while they share these core technologies, their approaches diverge significantly when it comes to hardware and infrastructure. DeepSeek has opted for a more open and decentralized approach, utilizing a wider range of hardware and making its models more accessible to developers and researchers. OpenAI, on the other hand, has invested heavily in specialized hardware and maintains a more centralized and controlled infrastructure.
These differences in hardware choices and infrastructure have significant implications for the cost-effectiveness, scalability, and accessibility of their respective AI models. They also raise important questions about the future of AI development, the role of open-source versus proprietary models, and the potential for collaboration and competition in the AI landscape.
The GPU-Centric Paradigm: Nvidia’s Rise and Potential Fall
The rise of AI has been intrinsically linked to the rise of the graphics processing unit (GPU). Initially designed for rendering graphics in video games, GPUs possess a unique architecture that makes them exceptionally well-suited for the parallel processing demands of deep learning algorithms. Unlike CPUs, which excel at sequential processing, GPUs can handle massive amounts of data and perform numerous calculations simultaneously, accelerating the training and execution of AI models.
Nvidia, with its strategic focus on developing high-performance GPUs tailored for AI applications, has emerged as the dominant player in this market. Its chips power the vast majority of AI systems worldwide, from research labs and data centers to autonomous vehicles and consumer devices. This dominance has fueled Nvidia’s remarkable financial success, with its stock prices soaring in recent years.
However, the limitations of the GPU-centric paradigm are becoming increasingly apparent, particularly for certain types of AI workloads. While GPUs excel at parallel processing, they can be constrained by their limited memory capacity and their inability to efficiently handle complex data structures or algorithms that require a higher degree of sequential processing.
Moreover, the energy consumption of GPUs is a growing concern. As AI models become larger and more complex, the energy demands of training and running them on GPUs have skyrocketed, raising concerns about environmental impact and operating costs.
DeepSeek and OpenAI, recognizing these limitations, are exploring alternative hardware approaches. DeepSeek has opted for a more diverse and energy-efficient strategy, utilizing a wider range of GPUs and even exploring alternative chip architectures. OpenAI, on the other hand, has invested heavily in specialized AI chips and cloud-based infrastructure, potentially sacrificing some flexibility for greater performance and scalability.
These diverging paths could have a significant impact on Nvidia’s future market position. If DeepSeek and OpenAI’s strategies prove successful, it could reduce reliance on Nvidia’s GPUs and potentially open up the market to new players and technologies.
The energy consumption of different AI chipsets is a crucial factor to consider. GPUs, while powerful, can be energy-intensive, especially during training. Alternative chip architectures, such as those based on neuromorphic computing or quantum computing principles, might offer lower power consumption while still providing sufficient performance for specific AI tasks.
Ultimately, the choice of AI hardware involves a trade-off between computing power, energy efficiency, cost, and scalability. There is no one-size-fits-all solution, and the optimal approach depends on the specific AI application and the priorities of the organization developing or deploying it.
DeepSeek’s Approach: A Closer Look at Their Hardware and Its Cost-Effectiveness
DeepSeek’s approach to AI hardware and infrastructure stands in stark contrast to the traditional GPU-centric paradigm. While companies like OpenAI and Google have invested heavily in the latest and most powerful GPUs from Nvidia, DeepSeek has charted a different course, one that prioritizes efficiency, adaptability, and cost-effectiveness.
Instead of relying solely on top-of-the-line GPUs, DeepSeek has adopted a more diverse strategy, incorporating a mix of readily available GPUs, including older models that are less expensive and more energy-efficient. This approach not only reduces their reliance on a single supplier but also allows them to optimize their hardware for specific AI workloads, choosing the most suitable GPU for each task.
For example, DeepSeek has been able to achieve impressive performance using older NVIDIA H800 GPUs, which are less powerful than the latest H100 models but significantly more energy-efficient. By optimizing their algorithms and software to efficiently utilize these older GPUs, DeepSeek has been able to reduce their energy consumption and costs without sacrificing performance.
DeepSeek’s network architecture also reflects this focus on efficiency. They have developed innovative techniques for distributing workloads across multiple GPUs, maximizing resource utilization and minimizing energy consumption. Their approach involves a combination of software and hardware optimizations, including custom algorithms and network protocols that streamline communication and data transfer between GPUs.
Furthermore, DeepSeek has implemented various energy-saving measures at the system level. One notable technique is dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS). DVFS allows the system to adjust the voltage and frequency of the GPUs based on the workload, reducing energy consumption during periods of low activity. This dynamic adjustment ensures that the GPUs are not consuming unnecessary power when they are not fully utilized.
In addition to DVFS, DeepSeek has explored alternative cooling solutions to further enhance energy efficiency. They have experimented with liquid cooling systems, which use liquid to transfer heat away from the GPUs more efficiently than traditional air-cooling methods. Liquid cooling can significantly reduce energy consumption and improve the lifespan of the hardware.
They have also investigated immersion cooling techniques, where the servers are submerged in a non-conductive liquid that absorbs heat directly from the components. Immersion cooling offers even greater efficiency compared to liquid cooling and can further reduce energy consumption and noise pollution.
The cost-effectiveness of DeepSeek’s approach is evident in their ability to achieve comparable performance to their competitors while significantly reducing their hardware and energy costs. This allows them to offer their AI models at a lower price point, making them more accessible to a wider range of users, including startups, researchers, and businesses with limited budgets.
Moreover, DeepSeek’s approach has a positive environmental impact. By reducing energy consumption and utilizing a wider range of hardware, they are minimizing their carbon footprint and promoting a more sustainable approach to AI development.
However, DeepSeek’s strategy also presents some challenges. The use of older or less powerful GPUs might limit their ability to scale their models to the same extent as companies with access to the latest and most powerful hardware. Additionally, their focus on efficiency might require more complex engineering and optimization efforts, potentially increasing development time and complexity.
Despite these challenges, DeepSeek’s approach demonstrates that innovation and cost-effectiveness can go hand-in-hand in the AI industry. By challenging the traditional GPU-centric paradigm, they are paving the way for a more diverse and sustainable AI ecosystem, where access to advanced technology is not limited to those with the deepest pockets.
OpenAI’s Strategy: Analyzing Their Hardware Choices and Potential Advantages
OpenAI’s strategy in the AI hardware arena diverges significantly from DeepSeek’s, showcasing a preference for specialized hardware, a cloud-based approach, and strategic partnerships. While DeepSeek has focused on maximizing the efficiency of readily available GPUs, OpenAI has invested heavily in custom-designed AI chips and a robust cloud infrastructure.
One of the cornerstones of OpenAI’s strategy is its close collaboration with hardware providers. Notably, their partnership with Microsoft has granted them access to cutting-edge technologies and resources, including specialized AI chips developed by Microsoft and access to Azure’s vast cloud computing network. These chips are designed specifically for AI workloads, potentially offering significant performance advantages over general-purpose GPUs.
OpenAI’s cloud-based approach further distinguishes its strategy. By leveraging the scalability and flexibility of the cloud, OpenAI can rapidly scale its AI models and services to meet growing demand. This approach also allows them to offer their AI models as a service (AIaaS) through APIs and other cloud-based platforms, making them accessible to a wider range of developers and businesses.
This strategy offers several potential advantages:
- Scalability: The cloud-based approach allows for rapid scaling of resources, ensuring that OpenAI can meet the growing demand for its AI models and services. This means that as the number of users and the complexity of AI applications grow, OpenAI can easily adjust its infrastructure to handle the increased workload without significant delays or disruptions.
- Accessibility: AIaaS offerings make OpenAI’s technology accessible to a wider range of users, including those who lack the resources to build and maintain their own AI infrastructure. This democratizes access to advanced AI capabilities, allowing smaller businesses, startups, and individual developers to leverage the power of AI without the need for significant upfront investment.
- Reduced Overhead: By offering AI as a service, OpenAI can reduce the overhead and complexity associated with managing and maintaining physical hardware. This allows them to focus on their core competencies of AI research and development, while relying on cloud providers for the underlying infrastructure.
- Flexibility: Cloud-based infrastructure provides greater flexibility in terms of resource allocation and deployment. OpenAI can quickly adjust its computing resources based on the specific needs of different AI models or applications, optimizing performance and cost-efficiency.
- Collaboration: Cloud platforms facilitate collaboration among researchers and developers, allowing them to share resources, data, and models more easily. This can accelerate the pace of innovation and promote the development of more robust and sophisticated AI solutions.
However, there are also potential drawbacks:
- Cost: Investing in specialized hardware and building a massive cloud infrastructure can be expensive, potentially limiting OpenAI’s flexibility and agility. The ongoing costs of cloud services can also be substantial, especially as usage scales.
- Dependence: Relying on specific hardware providers or cloud platforms could create dependencies and limit OpenAI’s control over its infrastructure. This could lead to vendor lock-in or potential disruptions if the provider experiences outages or changes its pricing or policies.
- Security and Privacy: Storing and processing sensitive data in the cloud raises security and privacy concerns. OpenAI needs to implement robust security measures to protect user data and ensure compliance with relevant regulations.
OpenAI’s strategy represents a calculated bet on the future of AI hardware. By investing in specialized chips and cloud infrastructure, they are aiming to achieve a performance advantage and broad accessibility. However, the long-term success of this strategy will depend on factors such as the continued advancement of AI chip technology, the evolving costs of cloud computing, and the changing demands of the AI market.
Beyond GPUs: A Vision for a New Hardware Paradigm
The limitations of relying solely on GPUs for AI computing are becoming increasingly apparent. While GPUs excel at parallel processing, they can be constrained by their limited memory capacity and their inability to efficiently handle complex data structures or algorithms that require a higher degree of sequential processing.
Moreover, the energy consumption of GPUs is a growing concern. As AI models become larger and more complex, the energy demands of training and running them on GPUs have skyrocketed, raising concerns about environmental impact and operating costs.
One promising alternative is the concept of a multi-CPU, energy-efficient server farm. This approach involves utilizing a large number of CPUs instead of relying primarily on GPUs. CPUs generally have larger memory capacity than GPUs, allowing for the processing of larger datasets and more complex AI models. Additionally, CPUs are better suited for handling complex data structures and algorithms that require a higher degree of sequential processing.
This paradigm shift requires a fundamental rethinking of AI hardware and infrastructure. It necessitates the development of redesigned motherboards that can accommodate a large number of CPUs and optimize their communication and data transfer. Additionally, innovative cooling systems are crucial to efficiently dissipate the heat generated by multiple CPUs while minimizing energy consumption.
One potential solution is a cooling system that can convert waste heat into usable energy, further enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of the server farm. This could involve technologies like thermoelectric generators or absorption chillers, which can capture and convert waste heat into electricity or cooling power.
The potential benefits of this multi-CPU, energy-efficient approach for AI computing are numerous. It could lead to significant cost reductions by decreasing reliance on expensive GPUs and optimizing energy consumption. Additionally, the modular design of a server farm allows for easy scalability, enabling the addition of more CPUs as needed to handle increasing AI workloads.
Furthermore, this approach promotes environmental sustainability by reducing energy consumption and potentially even generating energy from waste heat. It can also make AI technology more accessible to a wider range of users, including startups, researchers, and smaller businesses, by lowering the cost and increasing the flexibility of AI infrastructure.
Of course, this paradigm shift also presents challenges. It requires significant research and development in motherboard design, cooling systems, and energy recovery mechanisms. However, it also creates opportunities for innovation and collaboration across various fields, including materials science, electrical engineering, and computer science.
The potential impact of this paradigm shift on the AI industry is substantial. It could disrupt the current dominance of GPU manufacturers like Nvidia and create opportunities for new players in the AI hardware market. It could also lead to the development of more diverse and specialized AI systems, tailored to specific applications and industries.
Ultimately, the success of this new paradigm will depend on the collective efforts of researchers, engineers, and companies willing to invest in and explore its potential. By embracing innovation and collaboration, we can unlock a new era of AI computing that is more efficient, sustainable, and accessible to all.
How America can win the battle. A paradigm shift.
There is potential for a paradigm shift in AI hardware and software, moving away from the current one-size-fits-all approach towards a more specialized and modular design.
Just as our brains have distinct regions for various functions – language processing, memory, emotion, motor control – we envision an AI “brain” with dedicated components for different AI tasks. This modular approach could unlock significant benefits:
1. Enhanced Efficiency and Performance:
By assigning specific AI functions to specialized hardware and software, we can optimize each component for its particular task. This could lead to significant improvements in efficiency and performance, as each component would be designed to excel in its domain.
For example, instead of relying on general-purpose GPUs for all AI computations, we could have:
- Dedicated GPUs: Optimized for specific tasks like natural language processing or computer vision.
- Specialized AI chips: Designed for tasks like robotics control or real-time decision-making.
This specialization would allow each component to perform its function with greater speed and efficiency, potentially reducing energy consumption and improving overall performance.
2. Improved Scalability and Flexibility:
A modular design allows for greater scalability and flexibility. As AI models and applications become more complex, we can easily add or upgrade specific components without needing to overhaul the entire system. This enables us to adapt to the evolving needs of AI development and deployment more effectively.
For instance, if we need to enhance our natural language processing capabilities, we could simply upgrade the language processing module without affecting other parts of the system. This modularity would also allow for greater customization, enabling us to tailor the AI system to specific applications or industries.
3. Reduced Bloat and Streamlined Controls:
By creating an AI-specific operating system, we can eliminate the unnecessary bloat and overhead of general-purpose operating systems. This would streamline controls, improve efficiency, and potentially reduce security vulnerabilities.
A dedicated AI operating system could also provide a more intuitive and user-friendly interface for interacting with and managing AI systems. This would make AI technology more accessible to a wider range of users, including those without specialized technical expertise.
4. A True AI Brain:
Ultimately, our vision points towards the creation of a true AI brain, a holistic system that integrates specialized hardware and software components to achieve a higher level of intelligence and functionality. This brain would be capable of not only performing individual AI tasks but also coordinating and integrating those tasks to achieve complex goals and solve real-world problems.
A proprietary AI OS could contribute to American leadership in the AI field
- Protecting Intellectual Property:
A proprietary OS would allow us to protect our core technologies and algorithms, preventing competitors from easily replicating or reverse-engineering our advancements. This would give American companies a significant competitive edge and safeguard our investments in AI research and development.
- Controlling the Ecosystem:
By controlling the operating system, we can influence the development and deployment of AI applications, ensuring that they adhere to ethical guidelines and safety standards. This would help prevent the misuse of AI and promote responsible innovation.
- Collaboration and Innovation:
A proprietary OS could foster a collaborative ecosystem within the American AI community, allowing companies and researchers to share knowledge, build upon each other’s work, and accelerate innovation. This would create a virtuous cycle of progress, strengthening America’s position in the global AI landscape.
- National Security:
In the context of national security, a proprietary AI OS could provide a strategic advantage by limiting access to sensitive technologies and preventing adversaries from exploiting vulnerabilities in our AI systems. This would help protect critical infrastructure and ensure national security in the age of AI.
- Economic Competitiveness:
By fostering innovation and controlling key technologies, a proprietary AI OS could contribute to America’s economic competitiveness in the global market. It could create new jobs, attract investment, and drive economic growth in the AI sector.
However, it’s also important to consider the potential drawbacks of a proprietary approach:
- Limited Collaboration: A closed ecosystem might limit collaboration with international partners and researchers, potentially slowing down innovation in certain areas.
- Increased Costs: Developing and maintaining a proprietary OS can be expensive, potentially creating a barrier for smaller companies or startups.
- Potential for Abuse: Any technology, even one designed for good, can be misused. It’s crucial to have safeguards in place to prevent the abuse of a proprietary AI OS and ensure that it’s used ethically and responsibly.
Ultimately, the decision of whether to pursue a proprietary or open-source approach for AI operating systems is a complex one with significant implications for the future of AI development and its impact on society.
The need for an AI programming language. The limitations of current AI software practices.
We design software interfaces for human interaction – with menus, buttons, windows – because those are the tools humans are familiar with. But AI doesn’t interact with the world in the same way.
An AI-specific programming language could revolutionize how we develop and interact with AI. Imagine a language that allows us to:
- Define AI Goals and Objectives: Instead of focusing on individual tasks, we could define high-level goals and objectives for the AI, allowing it to autonomously determine the best approach to achieve them.
- Create Adaptive Algorithms: We could design algorithms that adapt and evolve based on the AI’s experiences and interactions with the world, enabling continuous learning and improvement.
- Facilitate Communication and Collaboration: The language could include features that facilitate communication and collaboration between AI systems, allowing them to share knowledge, coordinate actions, and work together towards common goals.
- Integrate with Hardware and Sensors: We could seamlessly integrate the language with AI-specific hardware, such as the multi-CPU server farms we discussed, and with various sensors that allow the AI to perceive and interact with the physical world.
This new paradigm of AI programming would move away from the traditional “command-and-control” approach, where humans dictate every action, towards a more collaborative and autonomous model, where AI is empowered to make decisions, solve problems, and even create new solutions.
Here are some potential benefits of an AI-centric programming language:
- Increased Efficiency and Productivity: AI could automate complex tasks and workflows, freeing up humans to focus on higher-level strategic thinking and creative endeavors.
- Enhanced Innovation and Creativity: AI could explore new solutions and approaches that humans might not have considered, leading to breakthroughs in various fields.
- Improved Safety and Reliability: AI could analyze vast amounts of data and identify potential risks or errors, leading to safer and more reliable systems.
- Greater Accessibility: AI could make technology more accessible to a wider range of users, including those with disabilities or those who lack technical expertise.
Of course, developing such a language would be a monumental task, requiring collaboration between AI researchers, linguists, and hardware engineers. But the potential rewards are immense. It could unlock a new era of AI development, where AI is not just a tool, but a partner in shaping a better future for all.
The Future of AI and the Evolving Hardware Landscape
The AI revolution is not just a technological shift; it’s a societal one. It’s a transformation that will touch every aspect of our lives, from the way we work and learn to the way we interact with each other and the world around us.
The battle between DeepSeek and OpenAI is a microcosm of this larger revolution, a clash of visions for the future of AI. But it’s also a reminder that this future is not predetermined. It’s a future that we will shape together, through our choices, our actions, and our unwavering belief in the potential for good.
The key takeaway from this AI showdown is the urgent need for innovation and collaboration. We cannot rely on the old paradigms, the outdated hardware and software that were designed for a different era. We need to embrace new ideas, challenge assumptions, and work together to build a future where AI is not just intelligent, but also responsible, beneficial, and accessible to all.
This requires a holistic approach to AI development, one that considers not just performance, but also cost, efficiency, and ethical implications. It’s about creating a sustainable AI ecosystem that benefits all of humanity, not just a select few.
It’s time to join the conversation, to contribute your voice, your expertise, and your passion to shaping the future of AI. Here are some ways you can get involved:
- Educate yourself about AI: Learn about the different types of AI, their potential benefits and risks, and the ethical considerations surrounding their development and use.
- Support research and development: Advocate for increased funding for AI research that prioritizes safety, ethics, and human well-being.
- Engage in discussions and debates: Share your thoughts and ideas about AI with others, participate in online forums and discussions, and contribute to the development of ethical guidelines and policies.
- Demand transparency and accountability: Hold AI developers and companies accountable for the responsible use of their technologies.
- Support organizations promoting ethical AI: Join or contribute to organizations that are working to ensure that AI is developed and used in a way that benefits humanity.
The future of AI is in our hands. Let us shape it with wisdom, foresight, and a commitment to building a world where AI is a force for good, a partner in our progress, and a catalyst for a brighter tomorrow.
Join the AI Revolution at SatoriGarrison.com
The AI revolution is transforming the world, and we need your help to shape its future. Join SatoriGarrison.com to learn more about AI, engage in discussions with other AI enthusiasts, and contribute to the development of ethical and responsible AI.
At SatoriGarrison.com, you’ll find:
- Informative articles and blogs about the latest AI trends and technologies.
- Opportunities to collaborate with other AI enthusiasts and contribute to research and development projects.
- A platform to share your ideas and participate in discussions about the future of AI.
Together, we can build a future where AI is used for good, benefiting all of humanity.
Sources:
- https://www.f22labs.com/blogs/openai-vs-deepseek-a-comparative-analysis/
- https://cloud.google.com/discover/deep-learning-vs-machine-learning?hl=en
- https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/nlp/#:~:text=Natural%20language%20processing%20(NLP)%20is,manipulate%2C%20and%20comprehend%20human%20language.
- https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/cloud-computing-dictionary/what-is-computer-vision#:~:text=Computer%20vision%20is%20a%20field,people%20in%20images%20and%20videos.
- https://www.restack.io/p/hardware-innovations-for-ai-technologies-answer-openai-role
- https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/why-gpus-are-great-for-ai/#:~:text=GPUs%20have%20been%20called%20the,for%20today’s%20generative%20AI%20era.
- https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-accelerator-vs-gpu#:~:text=The%20GPU’s%20impressive%20parallel%20processing,language%20models%20(LLMs)%20or%20neural
- https://cloud.google.com/discover/gpu-for-ai?hl=en
- https://www.marketplace.org/2024/03/08/what-you-need-to-know-about-nvidia-and-the-ai-chip-arms-race/
- https://aws.amazon.com/compare/the-difference-between-gpus-cpus/#:~:text=them%20in%20parallel.-,Design,cores%20and%20have%20less%20memory
- https://medium.com/@nandinilreddy/deepseek-bridging-performance-and-efficiency-in-modern-ai-106181a85693
- https://stratechery.com/2025/deepseek-faq/
- https://www.dw.com/en/what-does-chinas-deepseek-mean-for-ais-energy-and-water-use/a-71459557#:~:text=Reusing%20and%20recycling%20water%20and,cut%20water%20use%2C%20he%20said.
- https://time.com/7210296/chinese-ai-company-deepseek-stuns-american-ai-industry/
- https://www.channelinsider.com/news-and-trends/deepseek-ai-model-disrupts-industry/
- https://www.uxpin.com/studio/blog/interaction-design-its-origin-and-principles/#:~:text=Interaction%20design%20in%20HCI%2C%20which,as%20buttons%2C%20menus%2C%20and%20other
- https://shelf.io/blog/the-evolution-of-ai-introducing-autonomous-ai-agents/
- https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/elevating-uniquely-human-skills-in-the-age-of-ai/#:~:text=AI%20is%20reshaping%20leadership%20by,teams%20to%20work%20alongside%20AI.
- https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/how-ai-can-help-you-manage-risks/#:~:text=AI%20models%2C%20for%20instance%2C%20can,large%20amounts%20of%20data%2C%20including
- https://www.cliffordchance.com/insights/resources/blogs/talking-tech/en/articles/2024/12/inclusive-ai-for-people-with-disabilities–key-considerations.html
- https://www.builtinsf.com/articles/openai-microsoft-extend-partnership
- https://builtin.com/articles/ai-chip#:~:text=Unlike%20regular%20chips%2C%20AI%20chips,performance%2C%20speed%20and%20energy%20efficiency.
- https://builtin.com/articles/ai-chip#:~:text=Unlike%20regular%20chips%2C%20AI%20chips,performance%2C%20speed%20and%20energy%20efficiency.
- https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/explore-the-benefits-of-azure-openai-service-with-microsoft-learn/#:~:text=Scalability%20and%20reliability%3A%20Hosted%20on,leverage%20to%20deploy%20their%20AI
Leave a Reply